The Sad Story of Tim Lambesis

Some of you might know Tim Lambesis. Some of you might not. He’s the vocalist for influential Christian metalcore band As I Lay Dying.

Last week he was picked up on charges of conspiracy to commit murder. The San Diego County Sheriffs Department (SDSD) claimed Lambesis solicited a hitman to kill his ex wife on May 2nd while he was in Hong Kong on an Asian Tour.

What we know:

-The SDSD claims to have audio of Lambesis soliciting a hitman
-The SDSD claims that their undercover hitman received money and logistics regarding the hit
-Lambesis’ ex wife was dragging her feet regarding divorce hearings and complicating the issue after initially filing
-Lambesis’ ex wife’s brother works for the SDSD as a deputy
-The Deputy DA, Claudia Garcia-Grasso has a history of identity politics.
-The charges were downgraded once Lambesis obtained legal counsel who immediately started challenging their validity

This story has all the makings of a great churchian catastrophe, complete with marital counseling, post-marital accusations of infidelity. Also, dozing off at the beach while your 10 year old and 8 year old play and look after their 4 year old sibling apparently disqualifies you from being a safe guardian. I wonder how many safe parents actually exist under those standards. Certainly no safe grandparents exist as my grandmother could not be bothered to stay awake for more than 10 minutes at a time without conking out. My parents didn’t see this as an issue.

With full disclosure, this story is not over yet and we have not heard the facts in trial. I personally believe the Sheriffs bit off more than they could chew as a favor for one of their guys and a power-hungry DA was looking for a landmark case that would propel her to a federal position. Regardless, I’ll keep you posted.

Who Wants Your Guns?

Women. That might sound extreme, but I’m not exaggerating. In the New Jersey Senate, a group of lively Democrats had guns on the brain.

“We need a bill that is going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate.”

“They want to keep guns out of the hands of bad guys but they don’t have any regulations…to do it”

“They don’t care about the bad guys… All they want to do is to have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.”

[concerning the above quotes] “That’s the line they’ve developed”

All four of these quotes came from different speakers. Although some have admirably tried to pin down exactly who spoke, they are missing the forest through the trees. All of these voices came from women. Should we really be surprised?

Stand-Up-Washington-gun-control-rally

These suburbanites have descended from their gated communities to explain to us plebeians why we do not need firearms.

With the exception of Henry Rollins, virtually all of the most vocal opponents of property rights concerning firearms come from women or effeminate men. These people, more than anybody else, should favor the universal availability of firearms. Why?

Because there is not a single weapon on Earth aside from a gun that I can’t wield with far more efficiency than a 130 pound woman. And these count as weapons.

nonpareil_display_image

Handsome devil

The weak, the sickly, the elderly and the woman can all use firearms with far more skill than they can employ with knives, clubs, fists or broadswords (and who hasn’t carried these around the mean streets of Pleasantville).

Still, women are obsessed with their own personal safety as hypergamy has biologically engineered them to prioritize their survival and that of their children. The fact that they don’t care about having guns themselves doesn’t mean they don’t want protection.

new-women-for-obama-campaign-poster

The face of serfdom

They want guns paid for by you in the hands of people you don’t trust whose priorities focus on them. In short, you don’t just lose the ability to defend yourself, they gain all of the protection in the world while the lawless wolves look for new, more vulnerable victims: unarmed men.

Women-for-Obama

It’s not just his stance on birth control

We’re discussing the concept of replaceability. Heavy police-states replace polite societies of lawful men. Progressive redistributive policies have already stripped men of their property to provide for the female class. Now they prepare to strip men of their right to defend themselves in order to protect women. That’s why numbers like this exist.

2013-04-11-NBC-TDAY-GunPoll

Another gender gap for you.

These numbers look familiar.

virginia-gender-gap

Virginia Gender Voter gap, more or less consistent with the national averages.

On conservative issues, i.e. “Actions have consequences; I will take responsibility for my life.” Men typically answer “yes,” by 60% or more. Women typically answer “no,” by well under 50. This is hypergamy played out. Here are some more graphs

guns2

dem-women

Let’s note some things which differentiate a serf from a citizen. We start with property rights. Citizens own property. Serfs work on land that is owned by a monarch (or bureaucracy). Next comes family institutions, where citizens marry and have kids within the societal structure. Serfs petition the king for permission, and the king may have the opportunity to bed the wife first (carousel-style heh). Finally, we get to the concept of armament. The citizen has weapons. Weapons won independence for the citizen somewhere down the line. Serfs have no weapons. The king has weapons which he gives to his knights. The knights keep the serfs in line.

Citizenship begins in the rejection of serfdom and the use of force to become independent. The difference between serf and citizen doesn’t begin with property rights. It begins with weapons.

Right now a movement swells begging the king for grain, entertainment, and other things we can get for ourselves with some sweat. Worst yet, they call for the king’s knights to come take our weapons away and defend us like in the good old days. This movement is led by women who, in their desperation to escape the authority of a husband and the consequences of their actions, will raise a king to his throne and install roving bands of knights to harass us once more.

brutality by Wayne Tilcock slash Enterprise photo

Oh ye noble knights, how well doth thee distribute the justice of the king’s peace.

The Thought Process of A Woman Approaching the Wall

My mind has felt the stinging numbness resulting in exposure to extreme rationalization hamsters in the past two days. The only way I can lessen the pain is to pass it on to you.

Cosmo ran an article about how it feels when your besties get engaged or start having kids. Now critiquing Cosmo for intelligence is about as fair as lambasting Justin Bieber for his inability to read music. Neither flaw has had particular detriment to the success of either party. Still, we have things to learn from Cosmo.

Recently, one of my Facebook friends who I’ve known since middle school announced she was pregnant. I am happy she is expecting a baby, but here’s the thing: Notifications like that freak me the eff out, especially since they are so frequent on my feed. And I’m only 24. Whenever I see someone I grew up with is either engaged or expecting a little bundle of joy, so many feelings stir up inside me. This is what usually happens:

I’m glad she correctly labelled them as feelings as opposed to fully-formed logical thoughts.

Utter Shock
Obviously, getting married or having a bun in the oven is generally surprising. But seriously. WTFFF?! This is where I get all judge-y. I think the following things:

“Um, we’re in our early twenties. You’re waaay too young to be getting hitched or giving birth. DON’T YOU HAVE OTHER ASPIRATIONS?! Like…a kick-ass career?”

“You’ve been dating the same dude since high school. Are you REALLY sure he’s The One?”

“BABIES RUIN EVERYTHING. They are really awesome and will give you a ton of love, but really. Your life will change DRASTICALLY. FOR THE NEXT 18 YEARS, THAT THING IS YOURS. ARE YOU READY FOR THAT?! Also, they’re kind of expensive.”

Young marriages founded when both parties expect to get the most out of the exchange tend to fare better. Also, careers don’t seem so satisfying at the age of 39 when biology has shut any and all doors to the rearing of healthy and natural children. Lo and behold, a seven figure income and ranking 2nd in a powerful blue chip company pales in comparison to the simples joys of motherhood.

As for the expectation that a woman has to run through a rolodex of men before she finally picks right, I’d like to think that notion has been roundly debunked. A relationship that lasts from high school to mariage has several things going for it. Typically, the woman understands what she has to offer and settles for the commitment of one man rather than the attention of several dozen. The man understands that the woman is at her most attractive. They strike out a deal. I’m in favor of younger marriages so that these arrangements have the full protection and sanction of the state and community should biology become fulfilled in the act of procreation.

Babies do not give love. More often than not, they give headaches. And when they grow old enough to speak, accusations of “that’s not fair!” and other angry statements often outnumber statements of “I love you, daddy/mommy” by ten to one. Typically the type of woman having a child for the purpose of unconditional love does so because she cannot attract a stable mate due to her tanking smv. It would be far more humane for mother and child if she sought emotional affirmation from a pet dog instead, as dogs generally showcase more affection, appreciation, and love than children. Married couples know the score when it comes to children and almost always conceive because they genuinely want kids. That’s why young marriage is important.

Texting Friends
This is where I start texting my close girlfriends who knew that person.

“Can you buh-lieve So-And-So is preggers?! You’re not pregnant, RIGHT?!”

“Um…So-And-So is engaged. That’s like the third engagement I’ve seen this month.”

My friends are usually in the same state of disbelief as me. The usual response is: “STOP. JUST STOP.” or “OMG. GETTING ON FACEBOOK RIGHT. NOW.”

Don’t adjust your television. Your young peers are indeed getting married and starting families. Perhaps the myth of “waiting” until 30 and a stable career has started to lose traction. One can only hope.

Self-Reflection
And then I get all preach-y to myself. I like to look within about everything in my life and really understand why I feel the way I feel.

I mean, who really gives a fluck if these girls are getting engaged or pregnant?! It’s their business (that they just broadcasted to the entire Internet). So then I start to wonder if maybe I’m internally jealous of their lives. I am nowhere near getting hitched or knocked up. (READ: I AM SINGLE AND READY TO MINGLE. CALL ME, JASON.)

Okay. I’m probably a little jealous.

Could she finally have seen the light?

Come to Reality
And then I snap out of it because I realize that my life is freaking awesome. I still think these girls are cray cray for marrying and mating so early in their lives, but whatever. That’s their life choices. Not mine.

…So who wants to go grab some dranks and celebrate our singleness?

Nah.

And somebody needs to buy liberated females dictionaries. I don’t think they know what “reality” actually means.

If You Are A Grown Woman

Do not refer to your mother as “mommy.” Men will immediately write you off as having the emotional maturity of a kindergartener and severe freudian attachment issues with your mother. If I see one more grown-ass-woman gush in toddler language about the awesomeness of her mom today, I’m going to duct-tape a pacifier in her mouth.

Acceptable euphemisms for the female who gave birth to and/or raised you
-Mother
-Mom
-Ma (please use ironically if at all)

Unacceptable euphemisms for the female who gave birth to and/or raised you
-Mommy
-Mamma

tumblr_m9aeicMTBT1qmkygso1_500

This is creepy.

Tattoo-11-03-10-Pic-19-A_large

For when you want to tell a guy that he can get intimately familiar with the whole family in one night…

Do us all a favor and pretend you’re a mature adult who doesn’t still cling to your mother’s skirts and think it’s cute despite having your own car and loans to pay off.

Ugly Privilege?

Or hamster heaven: you decide.

I stumbled on a post by Tessah Shoenrock from 2011 that answered the question that plagued the minds of all Americans every night. No, not why on Earth we still had a recession and nobody seemed measurably better off from 3 years of so-called stimulation. She answered what it’s like to be a pretty girl.

2263879255_765f49b87f_z

Judge ye for yeselves

She has a couple dozen pics up here. I personally don’t think she’s anything special. I’d call her a 7 if these photos are trustworthy, especially considering all of these photos are professionally done and therefore primped and edited to flatter and improve.

Let’s take a read at what Ms. Shoenrock has to say.

Being pretty has some major benefits. I’ve definitely passed a few classes I shouldn’t have by batting my big brown eyes and crying crocodile tears. I used to be a hit at the bars (back when I still went to bars) because I could get free drinks just by asking for them, and I’ve avoided arrest a few times when I probably shouldn’t have. If you’re funny and smart, people tend to think you are a legitimate genius – probably because people never have expectations for pretty people anyway – except to stay pretty.

True on all points discussing pretty girls. Society has an exceptionally low bar for them due to their natural aptitude at attracting mates through positive features which ensure children will survive birth and weaning. Anything else is just icing on the cake.

It ain’t always easy, though.  People expect you to be an idiot, and when it turns out you have brains too, they tend to get freaked out. Prepare to get passed over for jobs with female hiring managers, and prepare for a string of jobs working for pervy male managers who gave you the job because they could see down your dress during the interview. Move to a bad neighborhood, and you better get a bodyguard or a boyfriend because the prison bodies down the street WILL say something inappropriate to you every chance they get. Something like, “Hey girl, you look like you taste sweet!” or “Dang, mama – lemme take a bite outta THAT!” “Can I be your sugar daddy?” or even just bark at you like a dog as they drive by (yes, all of these things really happen, sometimes even when I’ve got my glasses on).

And here the rationalization kicks in. She didn’t get the job because she was pretty and her intelligence threatened her ugly female employer. Even if studies have found this claim completely mercury-is-good-for-you-level wrong.

Also, men only hire her because they want to go hard in her love garden. No, really….why are you laughing? She’s just that gorgeous. Men hire her underqualified keister so they can stare at it. Women don’t hire her overqualified ass so they don’t have to compete with it. What’s that? She’s copping to being underqualified and qualified at the same time? Well the important fact is that she’s pretty and that’s been the biggest factor in her search for employment. Trust her.

As for needing a bodyguard for “inappropriate” comments, methinks this woman doesn’t understand what purpose bodyguards serve. They intervene between a charge and bodily harm. Cat-calling doesn’t constitute bodily harm in any way unless one happens to be one of the poor elevator-riding feminists who go into convulsions when a member of the opposite sex says hello and asks to get coffee.

I guess the real problem rests in the fact that these guys, instead of putting in years of beta supplication, take the direct route to propositioning for sex.

Nice guys will never, ever hit on you (presumably because they’re intimidated), but you will have more undateables flirting with you than you even thought existed. The #1 attempted pickup line will be, “Hey, are you a model?” which will embarrass you because A) obviously you’re not a model, and B) what are you supposed to say? “No, I’m not a model, I’m just NATURALLY GORGEOUS. SOAK IT UP.”

How did I guess that one? She wants a beta harem. I’m glad that she at least has the balls to draw the direct association between “nice guys” and “undateables” by using the terms interchangeably. Pay attention, gentleman. This is what happens when the newspeak translator lodged in modern enlightened women goes offline.

You will get so used to creepers creepin’ that it won’t faze you when the gas station attendant tells you he won’t accept your money because his payment is watching you suck on one of the Blow Pops you like to buy before work. And once you get to work, you will be forced to play nice when men try to hold your hand over the counter and give you “business cards” that are very clearly just a phone number written on the back of a Rite-Aid receipt.

She hates cads. She really hates them. She hates when they play that evil twisted “game” with her by making her do things like give her hand and giving her what is obviously not a business card while pretending it is. She hates them so much that she calls them and tells them. It always just magically comes out, “when can I see you again?” Of course they get the voicemail because only a chump takes the first call off a girl, especially one who goes head-over-heels for the fake business card bit.

On the flip side, you’ll get so used to this kind of attention that you’ll feel a misplaced sense of disappointment when you fail to attract catcalls from construction workers and garden-variety weirdos. You will also inevitably start to lean on your good looks in sticky situations, which will make you wholly unprepared to deal with the occasional hardass that doesn’t fall for pseudo-meaningful eye contact and flirty smiles. You are aware of this tendency, which gives you increasing levels of anxiety as you grow older and too broke to afford expensive skin-tightening cream from Sephora. You will, at least once, have a minor meltdown over morning pillow face, hyperventilating in the mirror over the overnight appearance of fine lines

I swear this woman’s cat, in an occurrence of pure statistical improbability, ran across the keyboard and produced the above paragraph. That’s the only logical explanation I can entertain for how such a sensible paragraph got lost in this trainwreck.

You won’t have many girlfriends; that much should be obvious. And when you start dating someone, you’ll have to get rid of all your non-gay guy friends because your boo factor will assume they all want to date/fuck you (which, to some extent, is probably true). On that note – be careful whom you choose to date, because years of only getting attention from losers with (excuse my pun) nothing to lose will do a number on your self-image.

Girls typically don’t have platonic friends. Men who have zero sexual interest in their female acquaintances are the exception, not the rule. As for having unrealistically low standards for men due to the worship of the beta and omega hordes, a word of caution to this type of self-assessment.

And women hate competition. Really attractive women tend to surround themselves with chattel to intercept and diffuse any betas or omegas while they focus on pulling an alpha. Women’s innate sense for game has remained largely intact despite the collapse of male wisdom in this field, hence why men need at the very least a basic crash course in game to compete.

When you go out, you always end up getting too messed up due to a combination of accepting too many free drinks from losers and drinking by yourself in the corner while your friends meet nice, college-educated guys with jobs. You take home a lot of gross guys out of boredom and loneliness. Your friends inevitably tire of taking you out because you end each night rolling around on the couch/bathroom floor clutching a bottle of CVS Chardonnay, crying “why don’t any cute boys LIKE ME??” while your friends roll their eyes because you got more attention from guys than anyone else.

Standard: a woman’s drunken tendencies always feature as the fault of society (run by men), or some man somewhere. But I wouldn’t let this overshadow the real gem here.

Her friends are more attractive. How do we know this? Because the marriageable men ignore her and go straight for the friends. Don’t let the rationalization fool you. They don’t get threatened by Ms. Shoenrock’s intellect or attractiveness. They have goals and standards and her friends satisfy them more than she does.

Desperation is a completely alien emotion to alpha females. The fact that the romantic successes (and the ability to extract commitment) of her friends creates such hopelessness in her should leave no doubt as to what this woman is.

Obviously I would rather be good-looking than average or even (gasp) unattractive, but once in a while it would be great if someone commented on something other than my appearance. “Wow, you’re so exotic, you should be a Laker girl” sounds like a compliment, but what I hear is “You should be a Laker girl because you look vaguely Puerto Rican and nobody cares that you can spell ‘facetious’ without looking at the dictionary.”

Why does Aaron Rodgers have to put up with people constantly telling him what a great arm he has or how flawlessly he executes plays? Can’t they recognize his solid grasp of Franciscan Theology and praise him for that? Why does everybody go on and on about Felix Dennis’ business savvy? Can’t they talk about his enthusiasm for flora?

Superstars of either gender imbued with desirable traits earn praise for those traits and those traits alone, typically, because this is what people value in them. All of the other things in their lives, while having great personal value to them, determine nothing in regards to the public’s image of them. Even if a star’s vanity project gains notoriety  as did Mr. Dennis’ poetry, it typically features as an attachment to the person and not an independent figure of interest.

I guess ultimately I would rather have all the advantages that good-looking people have, because we really do have it easier. But sometimes it would be nice to just be a face in the crowd.  Sometimes I just want to go to the donut store down the street without having to bring my pepper spray with me just in case the neighborhood teens decide to follow me there and threateningly back me up against the counter while demanding my phone number and address again, ya know?

I thought she just said they catcalled her. Now we’re jumping up to threat of assault? And now instead of the “prison bodies” she mentioned that hit on her, we’re talking about teenagers. This woman needs to get her story straight.

Also, her ode to “normalness” imbues me with the same emotional reaction as I have when multi-million dollar movie stars complain from their mansions about those pesky paparazzi.

So ends the rant of a pretty girl who doesn’t get jobs and does get jobs because she’s pretty and can’t get a boyfriend despite her friends’ successes in the field and her prettiness. If this seems like a heaping mass of contradictions, you must be one of those old-fashioned male bigots.

Violence Against Women Female Zombies

What’s that screeching sound? It hurts my ears. My cat ran for the basement. The birds outside went quiet. Hairline cracks are racing up my window. Oh, that’s what it is. It’s the sound of a couple hundred women whining in unison about something else that doesn’t matter.

Apparently there’s a group of neckbearded Omega males so bored with video games that they made a supply company specializing in preparing for the zombie apocalypse. But that’s not what has these girls’ boyshorts in a twist.

A shooting target mannequin named the “The Ex,” a large-breasted woman who bleeds when shot, is being sold on Amazon.com. It’s manufactured by Zombie Industries, a company that was featured at the NRA convention last weekend.

Gun violence against women is a serious problem. But “The Ex” shooting target turns violence against women into a joke and promotes the idea that men should want to kill their ex-wives or ex-girlfriends. Zombie Industries has already had to pull a mannequin target that resembled President Obama, so they are definitely attracting media attention right now–and it’s just the kind of bad press Amazon doesn’t want.

If we all speak up about this horrible “Ex” target we can get Amazon to do the right thing and stop carrying this dangerous product. Can you sign the petition?

While I agree that the average modern female is mindless, moans far too much, and stumbles around without any real admirable goals in a state of decay, I cannot agree that blasting a post-female zombie away in any way justifies violence against living women. Also, I’d like to think if anybody turned violence against women into a joke, it’s feminists. I chuckle every time I imagine this one taking a decent hook to the jaw.

the-ex-zombie-industries-1

Unlike an actual woman, she’s capable of maintaining silence for more than 5 minutes. Wakka wakka

Apparently the zombie’s name is Alexa. These feminists can’t even talk about this poor lifeless lump of silicone, plastic and food-dye using her name? So where the hell does domestic violence come in? In the description it gives a fictitious account of a guy who had to blow away his former love because she turned into a bloodthirsty monster who wanted to kill him. Ex wife go homicidal on her estranged husband? That never happens in real life.

cache_400_400_2_Leo_Shoulder

Zombie Privilege

Zombie Industries also carries a male version named Leo. You can pelt Leo with bullets just like Alexa. But isn’t this insensitive given that men are up to 3 times more likely than women to become victims of violence in their lifetimes?

Nope. Because hypergamy ensures women only ever think about women. Men can worry about men, so long as it doesn’t distract them from their required duty to worry about women.

But it gets worse. The company also has models mimicking clowns, Middle Eastern terrorists, Nazis, one named Rocky, and kangaroos. Somebody please alert Ringling Brothers, Barnum And Bailey, CAIR, Germany, Philadelphian Italians and Australia that their oppressed classes have come under fire.

The fact that advocacy groups are wasting public funds complaining about something so innocuous should tell us all that it’s time to shut them down. I challenge any feminist to demonstrate how blasting a zombie woman target composed of things that haven’t lived in the past geological era harms women. You can’t even argue that it conceptually harms women or trains people to harm women as the scenario is killing women who are already dead. Keep it up, feminists. With your honest up-front demands, you make a better PR department for the manosphere than we could ever establish.

“I need feminism because without it, lifeless pieces of plastic, silicone and fake blood would be getting shot.”

You know, when you think about it, feminists actually bear quite a resemblance to zombies. They have no functioning brain matter, grunt, moan, cannibalize men and other women to function, cannot form coherent sentences, operate only in groups, have problems running a mile in under 20 minutes, and smell like the wrong end of an alpaca. Perhaps they were right to find a threat in the shooting of zombie effigies after all.

CEO of Abercrombie and Fitch Triggers Bacon-Laced Tears

Blog 2 Photo

SIDEBOOB! Now that I have your undivided attention….

Hell hath no fury like a fat woman shamed. Apparently the teenage/young adult clothing retailer Abercrombie and Fitch, which also owns Hollister, refuses to carry XL and XXL in women’s sizes because they don’t want the chubsters advertising their logo. Makes sense to me. Why would you want people to associate your brand with a bunch of beached whales who will put the final fork in our healthcare system once it gets fully nationalized?

You could argue this business model lacks wide appeal, however, the A&F bottom line certainly isn’t hurting. So who cares if this corporation doesn’t feel like making clothes for the self-described “sturdy girls” (the only time I’ve ever seen the phrase “sturdy” associated with something that will die earlier)? The engorged multi-chinned hordes of women shaking fat fists and amputated diabetic leg stumps, that’s who.

A website called Elite Daily, which self-identifies as “The Voice of Generation Y,” printed this story on it. This website appears a gold mine of what passes for conventional stupidity these days. I will surely return for more. But for now, we must discuss the elephant in the fitting-room.

Apparently A&F’s largest female pant size is a 10. As a male, I only know simplistic waist inch X leg inch. I recall reading somewhere that average women weigh more than plus sized models (clocking in at a size 14). I browsed google but my efforts lost to the howling of the manifold fatties from Jezebel and Buzzfeed. (I’d like to think the claim that using plus sized models to make women less obsessed with weight is a bad idea as women have gotten fatter on average the less social shaming they face. It’s almost like shaming serves a purpose).

The author cries foul that A&F offers XL and XXL in men’s sizes, although A&F pointed out they appeal to athletes.

Male athletes look like this

youtube_vimeo_47875656_900x575

P P P P P P POOOOWWWWEEERRRR

Female athletes look like this

65876-amy-hastings-37cb2

To be fair, she was the US 10k runner in the Olypics. Then again, our volley-ball team isn’t that much chubbier

Female athletes don’t look like this

A REAL 3

If competitive sponge-cake-eating was a sport, she’d have more medals than Phelps.

Apparently all of this comes from CEO Mike Jeffries’ Corporate vision.

In every school there are the cool and popular kids, and then there are the not-so-cool kids…Candidly, we go after the cool kids. We go after the attractive all-American kid with a great attitude and a lot of friends. A lot of people don’t belong [in our clothes], and they can’t belong. Are we exclusionary? Absolutely. Those companies that are in trouble are trying to target everybody: young, old, fat, skinny. But then you become totally vanilla. You don’t alienate anybody, but you don’t excite anybody, either,
-Mike Jeffries in an Interview with Salon

Sounds awful alpha to me. The author of the Elite Daily article, Sean Levinson, sounds awful beta as he tosses off his parting remark.

After seeing a picture of Mike Jeffries, it can only be concluded that he was never around good-looking people as a kid and is now making up for the glamorous youth he wishes he had.

Perhaps he’s sad that Mr. Jeffries has the attention of the glamorous girls while Sean gets turned down by the fatties he spends all day standing up for. I’m not going to tell you Mr. Jeffries’ age, but let’s just say the betas, omegas, and fatties in the comments section seem all-the-more pathetic for harping on his appearance.

tumblr_mc5a9yBTle1qb7ac6

Flip flops and heterosexual men generally should mix (much less appear with pants), but I’ll give this guy a pass because he pisses off the fatties.

4d9f9afe-dabf-4bb8-b0ad-faa176f6c654

Masculine jaw? Check. Strong Brow? Check. Straight hairline? Check. Ironically, the guy’s got good old-school masculine good-looks. Modern manjawed women might find him unappealing next to his androgynous metro competitors, but this guy would never want for knockout female company in Eastern Europe even if he wasn’t a CEO of one of the largest publicly traded clothiers in the world. He probably doesn’t here either.

Not bad for 68, huh?